LHC grants protective bail to Imran Khan in 9 cases

Eight of the cases were registered under terrorism charges; IHC suspends IK’s arrest warrants in Toshakhana case till March 18.

0

LAHORE (APP): A Lahore High Court (LHC) division bench on Friday granted protective bail to Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan in eight cases registered under terrorism charges.
The court granted protective bail to the PTI chairman in five cases registered by Islamabad police and three cases registered by Lahore police till March 24 and March 27 respectively.
The division bench comprising Justice Tariq Saleem Sheikh and Justice Farooq Haider heard the bail petitions filed by the PTI chairman for protective bail in eight cases.
The PTI Chairman Imran Khan along with his counsel appeared before the court at 5.30pm, on being summoned.
Imran’s counsel argued before the bench that Islamabad and Lahore police had registered eight different cases against his client under the terrorism charges. He further submitted that details of some cases were not available.
However, the bench observed that it would consider only those cases wherein the petitions had been filed, adding “We could not grant blanket bail”.
Subsequently, the bench granted protective bail to the PTI chairman in eight cases registered by Islamabad and Lahore Police. Earlier, Justice Tariq Saleem Sheikh had summoned Imran Khan to appear before the court in connection with his protective bail at 5.30pm.
Imran Khan had filed petitions for protective bail in two cases registered at Ramna Police Station, Islamabad, two cases registered at Khana Police Station, Islamabad, one case registered at Bhara Kahu Police Station, Islamabad, and three cases registered at Race Course Police Station Lahore.
Meanwhile, the single bench comprising Justice Tariq Saleem Sheikh also granted protective bail till March 27 to the PTI chairman in a case registered by Sarwar Road Police against the PTI leadership over hiding facts in the PTI worker (Zille Shah) death case. Imran’s counsel argued before the court that the petition for bail in Toshakhana case had become ineffective. He submitted that Sarwar Road Police had registered a case against his client and others. He submitted that his client wanted to appear before the court concerned and pleaded with the court for grant of protective bail in this regard.
Moreover, Justice Tariq Saleem Sheikh restrained authorities from taking coercive measures against the PTI chairman till Tuesday, March 21 and sought details of cases registered against him across Punjab. The court passed the orders while hearing a petition filed by Imran Khan for details of the cases registered against him and other PTI leaders across Pakistan.
Imran’s counsel requested the court to stop respondents from taking any coercive measure against his client till the provision of details of cases registered against him.
A provincial law officer sought time for provision of details of cases, during the proceedings.
ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Friday stopped the capital’s police from arresting Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan till Saturday in the Toshakhana criminal case on his assurance to appear before the trial court on March 18.
Chief Justice Aamer Farooq while hearing the appeal against the verdict of the Additional Sessions Court for restoring the non-bailable arrest warrants of Imran Khan, directed the authorities to ensure foolproof security measures in the trial court on Saturday.
The Registrar Office had raised some objections to the appeal filed earlier in the case. However, the court took up the case for a hearing.
At the outset of the proceedings, the chief justice observed that there were some objections raised by the Registrar on the application. Imran Khan’s lawyer Khawaja Haris said the biometric objection had been removed.
The chief justice observed that Imran Khan’s undertaking regarding his appearance before the trial court was as worthy as his statement and that contempt of court proceedings could be initiated against him if it were violated.
He said the IHC did not decide on the matter previously and sent it to the trial court with the directive to take a decision after going through the undertaking. He asked on which grounds the trial court had rejected the undertaking.
Khwaja Haris replied that the trial court, in its order, had stated that the non-bailable warrants could not be cancelled due to the situation in Lahore.
He said the incident that happened in Lahore was unfortunate and a case in that regard had already been registered. “We had requested the trial court to cancel or suspend the arrest warrants against Imran Khan.”
The court asked whether the undertaking still existed.
Khwaja Haris said Imran Khan wanted to appear in the trial court tomorrow, adding that his client had been appearing in the courts before. He said that another application had also been filed for Imran Khan’s security.
The chief justice remarked that all were equal before the law, adding that he was told on the administrative side that security arrangements were being made and the trial court judge had also given an order in this regard.
Imran Khan’s Lawyer said that the petitioner was injured and there was a threat to his life during his appearance.
The court observed that it was expected that the sessions court would properly observe the security matter as well.
Khwaja Haris Advocate said that Imran Khan had also sought protective bail in other cases registered against him.
Imran’s lawyers also assured that his client would appear before the court tomorrow and requested that the arrest warrant may be suspended.
He said that they had submitted the original affidavit to the trial court and filing its copy with the IHC.
After hearing the arguments, the court stopped the police from arresting Imran and also directed the PTI chairman to appear before the court during court hours. The court served notices to the respondent and adjourned the case till March 21.
An application was also filed to get the details of the cases registered against the prime minister, which would be heard by the IHC on Monday.

 

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.